How Authoritarian Communitarian society looks like?

The concept of an "Authoritarian Communitarian" society might be somewhat paradoxical, as authoritarianism and communitarianism often represent opposing political and social ideologies. Authoritarianism typically involves a strong central authority with limited individual freedoms, while communitarianism emphasizes a sense of community and shared values with a focus on the common good.

However, hypothetically, if we were to consider a society that incorporates elements of both authoritarianism and communitarianism, it might look like this:

Strong Central Authority: The government or ruling body would have significant power and control over various aspects of society, including the economy, media, and individual freedoms. Decisions would be made by a centralized leadership to maintain order and enforce adherence to certain values.

Communal Values: Despite the strong central authority, the society would emphasize communal values and the common good. Individuals might be encouraged to prioritize the well-being of the community over personal interests. This could manifest in policies that promote social welfare, environmental sustainability, and community development.

Limited Individual Liberties: In an authoritarian communitarian society, individual freedoms and liberties might be restricted to prevent dissent and ensure conformity to the communal values set by the central authority. This could include limitations on freedom of speech, assembly, and political dissent to maintain social cohesion.

Social Uniformity: The society might aim for a certain level of social uniformity to foster a sense of community. This could involve cultural homogeneity, standardized education, and a controlled media environment to shape a shared narrative and values among the population.

Collective Decision-Making: While there is a strong central authority, decision-making processes might incorporate elements of collective decision-making at the community level. This could involve local councils or assemblies that contribute to policy formation, ensuring that the community's interests are considered.

Social Welfare Programs: To reinforce communitarian values, the government might implement extensive social welfare programs to provide for the basic needs of the population. This could include healthcare, education, and other services designed to enhance the well-being of the community as a whole.

It's important to note that such a hypothetical society would likely face challenges reconciling the inherent tension between authoritarianism and communitarianism. Balancing individual freedoms with communal values, and preventing abuses of power in an authoritative system, would be significant challenges in maintaining a stable and just society.

What if there is no aim to make a just society?

If there is no aim to make a just society, the characteristics of the hypothetical "Authoritarian Communitarian" society would likely emphasize control, stability, and the preservation of the ruling authority's interests rather than a genuine commitment to fairness and justice. Here are some potential features:

Repression of Dissent: In the absence of a commitment to justice, the ruling authority may resort to harsh measures to suppress any form of dissent or opposition. This could involve censorship, surveillance, and the use of force to maintain control and eliminate perceived threats.

Nepotism and Cronyism: Without a focus on justice, the allocation of resources, opportunities, and positions of power may be driven more by personal connections, loyalty to the ruling elite, or other arbitrary factors rather than merit or fairness.

Selective Application of Laws: The legal system may be used as a tool to control and manipulate the population rather than ensuring justice. Laws may be selectively enforced or modified to suit the interests of the ruling authority.

Inequality and Exploitation: In the absence of a commitment to justice, social and economic inequality may be rampant. The ruling elite may exploit resources and labor for their benefit, leading to a stark divide between the privileged few and the rest of the population.

Limited Social Mobility: Opportunities for upward mobility may be restricted, with social and economic status determined more by birth or political allegiance than individual effort or talent. This lack of social mobility can contribute to a stagnant and stratified society.

Propaganda and Manipulation: The absence of a commitment to justice may lead to the use of propaganda and manipulation to control public perception. Information may be distorted to maintain the legitimacy of the ruling authority and suppress any alternative narratives.

Lack of Accountability: The ruling authority may operate with impunity, without being held accountable for actions that infringe on individual rights or violate ethical norms. This lack of accountability can contribute to a culture of corruption and abuse of power.

In such a society, the absence of a commitment to justice can result in widespread social discontent, resentment, and instability. It may also hinder long-term societal development, as resources and opportunities are not allocated based on merit or the common good.

Лол.

aa4bed762...35.jpeg, 346.59 KB, 1280x720, exif ggl iq id3

Неравноправный ☝ Авторитарный Коммунитаризм